How a Religious CULTure is Created! 
How to Determine if a Group is a Destructive Cult
Dangerous Cults Focus on Leaders
There has been much confusion about cults and how to 'pickem'.
Some have difficulty identifying a cult because it is not so easy to identify one that is not even religious. For this reason, over the years, different definitions of what actually is a cult have developed to make it easier when you know little about their beliefs.
The different definitions:
SECULAR DEFINITION:
CULT - From the Latin "cultis" which denotes all that is involved in worship, ritual, emotion, liturgy and attitude. This definition actually denotes what we call denominations and sects and would make all religious movements a cult.
CHRISTIAN DEFINITION
CULT - Any group which deviates from Biblical, orthodox,historical Christianity. e.i.......They deny the Deity of Christ; His physical resurrection;.......His personal and physical return to earth and salvation by FAITH alone.
This definition only covers those groups which are cults within the Christian religion. It does not cover cults within other world religions such as Islam and Hinduism. Nor does it cover Psychological, Commercial or Educational cults which do not recognize the Bible as a source of reality.
UNIVERSAL DEFINITION:
CULT - Any group which has a pyramid type authoritarian leadership structure with all teaching and guidance coming from the person/persons at the top. The group will claim to be the only way to God; Nirvana; Paradise; Ultimate Reality; Full Potential, Way to Happiness etc, and will use thought reform or mind control techniques to gain control and keep their members.
This definition covers cults within all major world religions, along with those cults which have no OBVIOUS religious base such as commercial, educational and psychological cults. Others may define these a little differently, but this is the simplest to work from.
THE 'ORTHODOX BIBLE-BASED CULT'
A group is called a cult because of their behaviour - not their doctrines. Doctrine is an issue in the area of Apologetics and Heresy.
Most religious cults do teach what the Christian church would declare to be heresy but some do not. Some cults teach the basics of the Christian faith but have behavioural patterns that are abusive, controlling and cultic.
This occurs in both Non-Charismatic and Charismatic churches.
These groups teach the central doctrines of the Christian faith and then add the extra authority of leadership or someone's particular writings. They centre around the interpretations of the leadership and submissive and unquestioning acceptance of these is essential to be a member of good standing. This acceptance includes what we consider non-essential doctrines e.i. not salvation issues (such as the Person and Work of Christ.) The key is that they will be using mind control or undue influence on their members.
An excellent book on this subject is "Churches that Abuse" by Dr Ronald Enroth.
Using these guidelines of definition, Bible-based, Psychological, Educational and Commercial aberrations can easily be identified.
OTHER IDENTIFICATION MARKS:
(a) The group will have an ELITIST view of itself in relation to others, and a UNIQUE CAUSE. e.i. THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES RIGHT - everyone else is wrong. THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES DOING GOD'S WILL - everyone else is in apostasy.
(b) They will promote their cause actively, and in doing so, abuse God-given personal rights and freedoms. This abuse can be THEOLOGICAL, SPIRITUAL, SOCIAL & PSYCHOLOGICAL.
HOW THEY DO THIS:
(1.) Their leader/s may claim a special, exclusive ministry, revelation or position of authority given by God.
(2.) They believe they are the only true church and take a critical stance regarding the Christian church while at the same time praising and exalting their own group, leader's and work.
(3.) They use intimidation or psychological manipulation to keep members loyal to their ranks. This could be in the form of threats of dire calamity sent by God if they leave; certain death at Armageddon; being shunned by their family and friends etc. This is a vital part of the mind control process.
(4.) Members will be expected to give substantial financial support to the group. This could be compulsory tithing (which is checked); signing over all their property on entering the group; coercive methods of instilling guilt on those who have not contributed; selling magazines, flowers or other goods for the group as part of their "ministry".
At the same time bible-based cults may ridicule churches that take up free-will offerings by passing collection plates and/or sell literature and tapes. They usually brag that they don't do this. This gives outsiders the intimation that they are not interested in money.
(5.) There will be great emphasis on loyalty to the group and its teachings. The lives of members will be totally absorbed into the group's activities. They will have little or no time to think for themselves because of physical and emotional exhaustion.
This is also a vital part of the mind control process.
(6.) There will be total control over almost all aspects of the private lives of members.
This control can be direct through communal living, or constant and repetitious teaching on "how to be a true Christian" or "being obedient to leadership".
Members will look to their leaders for guidance in everything they do.
(7.) Bible-based cults may proclaim they have no clergy/laity distinction and no paid ministry class - that they are all equal.
(8.) Any dissent or questioning of the group's teachings is discouraged. Criticism in any form is seen as rebellion. There will be an emphasis on authority, unquestioning obedience and submission. This is vigilantly maintained.
(9.) Members are required to demonstrate their loyalty to the group in some way.
This could be in the form of "dobbing" on fellow members (including family) under the guise of looking out for their "spiritual welfare".
They may be required to deliberately lie (heavenly deception) or give up their lives by refusing some form of medical treatment.
(10.) Attempts to leave or reveal embarrassing facts about the group may be met with threats. Some may have taken oaths of loyalty that involve their lives or have signed a "covenant" and feel threatened by this.
Refugees of the group are usually faced with confrontations by other members with coercion to get them to return to the group.
SOME ABUSES OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS:
(1.) ABUSE OF INDIVIDUALITY:
They adopt a "groupness" mentality. They are not permitted to think for themselves apart from the group and only accept what they are told.
(2). ABUSE OF INTIMACY:
Relationships with friends, relatives, spouses, children, parents etc are broken or seriously hampered.
(3.) ABUSE OF FINANCES:
Pressure to give all you can to the group. In non-communal groups, members usually live at the lower socio-economic strata, not because of a lower income level, but because they are always giving money to the group for some reason.
(4.) "US VERSUS THEM" MENTALITY:
Isolation from the community in general. Anyone and everything outside the group is seen as "of the devil" or "unenlightened" etc. Their enemies now include former friends; the Christian church; governments; education systems; the media - the world in general. Those who are involved with these in any way see such involvement as a "means to an end".
(5.) ABUSE OF TIME AND ENERGY:
The group controls and uses almost all the members time and energy in group activities. They are usually in a constant state of mental and physical exhaustion.
(6.) ABUSE OF FREE WILL:
They must unquestioning submit to the groups teachings and directions and their own free will is broken. Their "will" actually becomes the groups "will" without their realizing it. This is done either by coercive methods including low protein diets and lack of sleep, or over a period of time through intimidation. Both methods make heavy use of "guilt".
RESULTS OF THIS ABUSE:
(1.) PERSONALITY CHANGES:
Relatives will say they no longer recognize the person.
From a warm, loving personality will come heaped abuse, rejection and feelings of hate. The cult member sees himself as "righteous" in comparison and this comes across in their attitude toward all outsiders.
(2.) LOSS OF IDENTITY:
They cannot see themselves as individuals apart from the group. Some even change their name as a rejection of their former life.
(3.) PARANOID - WE ARE BEING PERSECUTED:
Any time you say anything negative about the group, whether justified or no, it is regarded as "persecution".
Any criticism of the individual is also seen as persecution only because they are the "true Christian" or "enlightened" one - not because they, as an individual, have done the wrong thing.
However, at the same time they will feel free to criticize whatever you believe, say and do because they are "the only ones who are right".
(4.) SOCIAL DISORIENTATION:
They lose their ability to socialize outside the group. This can go so far as to not being able to structure their time or make simple decisions for themselves when they leave.
Their world-view alters and they perceive the world through their leaders eyes. They become very naive about life in general.
(5). SEVERE GUILT COMPLEXES:
They are made to feel guilty of everything they did before entering the group and are to strive to be "good" and "worthy" for "eternal life". Misdemeanors are made into "mountains" so that members are in a constant state of guilt for infringing even the most minor rules. Guilt comes because they aren't doing enough; entertaining doubts or questions; even thinking rationally for oneself.
This guilt is piled upon pile with new rules constantly being laid down about what is sinful and what is not. Illness may be seen as lack of faith - more guilt. Emotional illness may be seen as proof of sin in your life - more guilt.
SUMMARY:
Not all these points will be found in every cult, but all cults will have some if not most of them, although these may vary to some degree.
Copyright 1985 Jan Groenveld
(Reproduction is permitted only if text is intact, not within the body of any other text, and is not sold for gain or profit. The above identifying information must be left intact.)
the word "cult"
I too thought that "cult" was short for "occult" initially and therefore struggled a lot with the idea that we had been members of a cult. And all I knew about the occult was nothing, save a shadow of an idea that it involved worship of demons and practice of witchcraft, which of course, 2x2ism does not.
I was helped to accept the term as none-offensive as applied to my former group first by learning that it did not mean "occult." Secondly, some of the first realizations when I began studying history were that the Roman empire had many cults within its state sanctioned 'religions and the members of these groups did not consider it offensive to be called a cult, in fact called those groups cults themselves. It seems that to the Roman citizen the word cult merely referred to the group with allegiance to a particular Roman deity, and it was common for a single Roman citizen to be a member of several of such cults at the same time. There was the cult of Caesar and the cult of Dianna for just two examples of such Roman state sanctioned cults. And the word to them was very similar to our word "club" in our society. In Roman society, the cult was not a sorce of "salvation," so it was thought well to be in several cults, just as it is presently though for our citizens to be in several "clubs."
But with regard to the application of the word "cult" in terms of Bible based beliefs, teachings and in terms of "salvation" by those who called themselves Christians, my first introduction to Christian application of the term "cult" was a small book named Know The Marks of Cults by David Breese. And once I began to understand these marks, I lost my aversion to use of the word "cult" simply because it bore clear and understandable definition that is not intended in the least to be offensive to anyone. It is a word that is intended to mean a collection of restrictive characteristics of non-Biblical origin within a group that claims to be "Christian," and/or heresy. It was media attention to modern cults such as Johnstown and the Branch Dividian that made the word "cult" as offensive as it is to groups who claim to be Christian today. No one likes to think they could be so deceived as to commit suicide or be totally restricted by their belief system. The offense attached to the word has more to do with common human pride than anything else.
I do try to avoid us of the term cult most of the time when dealing with the subject of 2x2ism because it does tend to shut the ears of not only 2x2s, but some Christians as well. But the fact id that we must deal with the meaning of the word cult if we are going to use it at all. And if we don't do so, then instead of saying "cult" we would need to write volumes of text to deal with each mark of a cult -- kind of similar to the 2x2 denial of a name for their church, which is quite impossible. So I do use the word "cult" with its specific definition(s), just as I used the name "The Truth" with specific meaning in the past.
A cult
I still like the simple definition:
A cult is any group gathered around someone's misinterpretation of the Scripture!.
But that 'narrows' it ~ I suspect, to only 'religious' cults!?
It is a word that does need to be qualified....
I think the reason I have been somewhat skeptical of the word was my long-standing notion that it only ever applied to the 'occult'......
Therefore - for 'our' purposes...as those who once held a one-way persuasion, we need to qualify a correct Scriptural understanding of the many mis-interpretations of Scripture that we gathered around and defended in ignorance.
It is more helpful if we dare use the word cult in a personal conversation to show what we mean and why we would or could call a particular persuasion to be a mis-interpretation of the Scripture.!
If we don't raise the intellectual bar with qualifying 'argument'...simply using the word 'cult' will only offend people and make them defensive. I know that I for one have used the word cult without explaining why and qualifying my reasons and it has shut my 'listener' down before I arrived at first base!
I am slowly learning it is more helpful to stick with defending sound doctrine.
sharon